It doesn't matter how you're using him (be it up-front meatsack or back-rank support), he can heal and stress-heal regardless whenever nothing else is required, and either prevent damage with lance (back) or stun (front) inbetween. Up front, his stun is not much better than a Vestal's, stun-wise, yet hits much, much harder - so much that you can remove Smite from your bar and slot in more support buttons.Ĭrusader has quite a few trinkets that can make both his heal & stress-heal relatively solid (and +healing also adds more to HP restored via stress-healing). Compare that to a Crusader who can lance back-rank priorities (and typically delete them outright) and help wipe up the damage from anywhere via heals and stress-heals. Vestal is the most powerful 'healer' in the game but lacks in every other department, so one could argue that having one is indeed a massive safety net but also a reason you take more damage compared to a damage dealer. mega-phat heals = only heals worth considering), yet spent his time stacking multiple healers, not doing enough damage and, as a result, needing all the healing because of an endless loop of just sitting around eating too much damage.
One of the mistakes a previous poster made was publicly stating "OCC was mandatory" (ie.
A Crusader helps with this more than a Vestal would - the only reason you'd take her instead is because she's the best safety-net in the game. Good play can be sustained by a measly Antiquarian if you wish - which involves preventing damage before it happens so less healing is required overall. This is the wrong mentality (and part of the reason said person is needlessly bashing the class). And while I agree his heal is bad it’s because he’s suppose to help support a normal healer.
0 kommentar(er)
